Home · Work · New product development
Mothers rated a children's drink concept highly; the implicit read showed it was missing the one association that moves the category
A beverage company had a concept for a children's drink and wanted to know whether it worked with mothers, and what it was really communicating.
Mothers rated the concept on a structured questionnaire, then completed a short PrimE exercise that times how quickly they connect the category with each benefit. Both reads came from the same women in the same session.
Stated reaction was excellent: 95 per cent rated the concept excellent or good. The implicit read found the gap: immunity, not taste, was the association that moved mothers, and the concept was not connecting its health message to it. The client kept what mothers liked and re-aimed the claim.
Curious to know more? Write to us and we will take you through this case, and others like it, in depth. projects@bigbluebanyan.com
- The question
- Does the concept for a new children's beverage work with mothers, and is it saying the right thing?
- Approach
- Central location test with mothers: stated reaction, then PrimE response-time association on the same respondents
- Where
- Two metros, India
De-identified. Names, places and distinguishing details are generalised.
Related studies
Mothers bought the logic of stage-wise nutrition for children; two words on the board and trust in a new maker were the hurdles
A new entrant's children's supplement concept, tested with mothers in two metros. The idea landed; two words and an unfamiliar maker were the hurdles. The board was rewritten and the lead format chosen.
The drink was liked more than its concept once tasted, and lost its novelty in the same sitting
Concept first, product second, same respondents. The drink beat its concept and lost some novelty in the same sitting. Two fixes named and made before launch.
All four purifier concepts cleared the launch gate; forced choice and price testing picked the one to launch
Four concepts, four price tiers, one launch slot. All four passed on likeability; forced choice and price testing picked the winner, and it held in every city.
Have a similar question?
Tell us the decision behind it. A senior researcher replies quickly with what it would take.
