Blind scores alone would have picked the wrong energy drink; tasting order, a taste benchmark and a regional read found the right one
An energy-drink company had two formulations in a savoury regional flavour and wanted them tested blind against a popular, cheaper drink in the same flavour as the taste benchmark.
Every respondent tasted all three in rotated order. Monadic ratings, forced preference and a regional split were read together rather than one at a time.
The benchmark won every monadic rating, as cheaper familiar tastes often do. Forced choice told a different story: one formulation led clearly once the benchmark was set aside, and the regional split explained why the other had looked competitive. The client took one formulation national and kept the other as a possible southern variant.
Curious to know more? Write to us and we will take you through this case, and others like it, in depth. projects@bigbluebanyan.com
- The question
- Which of two candidate energy-drink formulations should launch?
- Approach
- Blind central location test, rotated order, against a cheaper non-energy benchmark in the same flavour; forced preference
- Where
- Four cities, India, 2026
De-identified. Names, places and distinguishing details are generalised.
Related studies
The drink was liked more than its concept once tasted, and lost its novelty in the same sitting
The same respondents saw the concept first and tasted the product second. The drink beat its concept but lost some novelty in the same sitting. Two fixes were named and made before launch.
A four-week home placement gave an anti-acne gel a go decision and a set of consumer-backed claims
An anti-acne gel was used at home for four weeks. The client got a go decision and claims backed by users.
Two plant-based drinks, read blind against their competitors: one needed reinforcing, the other reformulating
Two plant-based drinks were tested blind against rivals. One needed small improvements and the other a new recipe.
Have a similar question?
Tell us the decision behind it. A senior researcher will reply quickly with what it would take.