Two life insurance ads scored well on recall and persuasion; second-by-second EEG data showed exactly where each lost the viewer
A life insurer wanted to know how two TV ads already on air were working, beyond what viewers said about them.
Both ads were tested with EEG, eye gaze and facial expression recorded second by second, alongside a standard questionnaire.
Both scored well on recall and persuasion; implicit engagement was average, and the traces showed precisely which scenes held attention and which lost it. The client took five concrete rules into the next creative brief.
Curious to know more? Write to us and we will take you through this case, and others like it, in depth. projects@bigbluebanyan.com
- The question
- How did two aired TV ads really work, and what should the next campaign learn from them?
- Approach
- TriE: EEG, eye gaze and facial expression, second by second, beside a standard questionnaire
- Where
- Two cities, India, 2018
De-identified. Names, places and distinguishing details are generalised.
Related studies
New outdoor designs scored level on stated measures; implicit engagement and association shifts showed which one worked harder
Two outdoor designs scored the same when people rated them. Eye gaze and association measures showed which one worked harder.
A post-launch check showed a new corporate film carried the brand at 80 per cent, well above the norm
A corporate film with late branding was checked after launch. Eight in ten viewers linked it to the brand unprompted, well above the norm. One small fix was made for the digital cuts.
Two video formats scored alike in isolation; seen side by side, seven in ten chose full animation
Two video formats scored the same when rated alone. Side by side, 69 per cent chose full animation. The test became the client's routine for later creatives.
Have a similar question?
Tell us the decision behind it. A senior researcher will reply quickly with what it would take.
